Source details
Quaternary Research 55,322–331(2001), University of Washington; author-hosted HWS reprint
Page or archive reference: Printed 322 / PDF 1: authors, title, 2001 journal citation, DOI 10.1006/qres.2001.2232, abstract with alternative mechanisms and copyright notice.
Public draft citation only; private source and original research remain private.
Page or archive reference: Methods, printed 323–324 / PDF 2–3: July 1998, about 70 kmprofiles, 38 east-west lines and one north-south tie; six-metre vessel/acoustic system. No sediment cores recovered directly as part of this study.
Public draft citation only; private source and original research remain private.
Page or archive reference: Special Features/Subaqueous slide, printed 325 / PDF 4: interpreted eastern slide deposit, more than 4 kmnorth–south, up to 300 mwide and 15 mthick. Do not use the printedvolume/unit or infer an observed prehistoric eyewitness event.
Public draft citation only; private source and original research remain private.
Page or archive reference: Discussion, printed 326 / PDF 5: boundary age about 4,600 radiocarbon yearsB.P. estimated assuming constant sediment accumulation over about 13,900 radiocarbon years. Not a direct radiocarbon determination on this slide.
Public draft citation only; private source and original research remain private.
Page or archive reference: Discussion/conclusions, printed 329–330 / PDF 8–9: slide-trigger alternatives and preferred lake-level-fall hypothesis; erosion-surface alternatives with no independent 26 mfall evidence, favored wind-driven bottom currents. Proposed interpretation, not established sole cause or present hazard forecast.
Public draft citation only; private source and original research remain private.